SecurityBrief UK - Technology news for CISOs & cybersecurity decision-makers
United Kingdom
UK AI Council opens membership to build AI competence

UK AI Council opens membership to build AI competence

Thu, 10th Sep 2026 (Today)
Joseph Gabriel Lagonsin
JOSEPH GABRIEL LAGONSIN News Editor

The UK AI Council has opened membership and launched its website, ukaic.org. It aims to bring together AI users, developers, researchers, educators and leaders across the UK.

The organisation is positioning itself as an independent, not-for-profit membership body focused on building practical competence in artificial intelligence, rather than creating standards or acting as a regulator. Membership is open to individuals and organisations at different stages of adoption, with free entry points and academic partnerships intended to widen access.

The launch comes as businesses, universities and public institutions face growing pressure to understand how to use and oversee AI tools. The Council says its role is to help members navigate existing frameworks such as NIST, ISO and the EU AI Act, while sharing practical experience from across its membership.

It will not act as a government department, public body, regulator or awarding body, and says it will not lobby for any single commercial interest. Instead, it aims to serve as a link between academia, industry, government and individual members.

Chief Executive Officer Philip Blake set out the organisation's focus in a statement marking the launch.

"Plenty of people are writing about what AI will do. Far fewer are doing the unglamorous work of making people competent at it. That is the work we have set ourselves, and from today anyone can join us in it," said Philip Blake, Chief Executive Officer of the UK AI Council.

The group says it wants to address a gap between high-level national AI ambitions and the broader skills needed to use the technology responsibly in workplaces and institutions. Its model is based on a membership pathway designed to take participants from early interest to recognised expertise.

Membership model

The Council has outlined several principles for the organisation, including what it describes as a competence-first approach, open access, practical training and an evidence-led model shaped by member insight. It also plans to offer training, certification and events aimed at workplace use.

That emphasis reflects a wider UK debate over how AI skills should spread beyond specialist technical teams. Employers in sectors from finance and manufacturing to healthcare and education are grappling with questions of deployment, governance and workforce training as generative AI systems move into everyday use.

The Council says its offer is designed to serve both senior decision-makers and newcomers. In its view, building an AI-capable country requires a broader base of people and organisations that can use, govern and develop the technology, rather than relying only on policy documents or investment pledges.

Chief Operating Officer Amelia Hewitt described the launch as a practical starting point for that effort.

"A launch event is a small thing on its own. What matters is that from today there is somewhere to go, whether you are a chief executive working out where to start or a student who has never been given a route in," said Amelia Hewitt, Chief Operating Officer.

Partnership tiers

Alongside membership, the organisation has opened founding partnerships structured over 12 months rather than around a single event. It has set three levels: Founding Partner at GBP 7,500 plus VAT, limited to 10 organisations; Strategic Partner at GBP 3,500 plus VAT; and Networking Partner at GBP 1,500 plus VAT.

These partnership packages suggest the Council is seeking early institutional backing as it builds its member base. The inclusion of academic partnerships and free entry routes also points to an effort to balance commercial support with wider access for students and individuals.

The organisation's decision not to create new standards may help it avoid direct overlap with regulators, accreditation bodies and standards-setting institutions. Instead, its stated approach is to guide members through existing frameworks and share best practice drawn from user experience.

That could appeal to companies and institutions trying to make sense of a fragmented governance landscape. AI rules and guidance continue to evolve across jurisdictions, and many organisations are looking for practical advice on implementation rather than new compliance structures.

The Council's launch adds another player to the growing UK network focused on AI policy, skills and adoption. Its pitch is narrower than that of a trade association and broader than that of a training provider, with an emphasis on bringing different parts of the AI ecosystem together in one membership body.

Whether it can build influence will depend on the breadth of its membership and the relevance of the training and guidance it offers. For now, the organisation is presenting itself as a forum for people who use, build, govern or teach AI and, as Hewitt put it, "from today there is somewhere to go, whether you are a chief executive working out where to start or a student who has never been given a route in."